Exam questions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Exam questions - Essay Example Times have changed, and this has brought issues such as environmental concerns (Shaheena, 2008). The following are some of the other trends that have arisen in the sphere; Organizations under Constant Scrutiny One notable development over the past decades is that organizations are continually loosing grip of the information that reaches their customers. This is the information era, and everyone seems to know more than they actually do. The fact that people are constantly seeking information, the numerous channels of passing information, and that there is freedom of expression in most nations forces most organizations to lose some grip on the information that gets to the public (Thomas, 2009). This is the reasons why organizations are competing with these outside sources of information by using the same means such as setting up websites along with utilizing popular social media sites. Responsibility as an Organizational value During the past few decades, many organizations have incorp orated the elements such as sustainability, responsibility, and respect into their workplaces. Initially, only a handful held this trait since their work demanded so. Examples of such organizations included Ben & Jerry’s, Starbucks, and Tom’s of Maine. ... In 1943, Johnson & Johnson was accredited as the first organization to act responsibly towards the community. While the CSR department is deemed as the core steward of this attribute, present trends depict that organizations are using them internally requiring everyone to exhibit good citizenship. Recognition that CSR can foster skills in the workplace It is said by some economic experts that the world economy is still trying to heal its wounds from the economic downturn of 2008. During this period, most multinationals focused on the validity of every job and employee within their realm. The recession caused most organizations of this nature to limit the leadership and training initiatives. This caused a challenge since the heart of any organization can be stated as its employees; they put the welfare of the organization in a destitute place whenever they are not advancing in any way. The future seemed obscured for most of these organizations up until some discovered that CSR held a key to the issue (Thomas, 2009). Organizations such as IBM used CSR to indirectly train its employees. The technique was that activities embedded into CSR such as volunteering are imperative in building skills in employees; mainly through skill-based and pro-Bono volunteering. For instance, IBM commissioned approximately a hundred and fifty thousand workers to perform community service all across the globe. This technique was assumed by other organizations who sought to benefit in the same way. It was possible to do so because the workload was dismal thanks to the recession, but it gave organizations something to mull about. Presently, organizations can consent some of their workforce to this service to the society and consequently develop skills without

Brief the case of Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006) Coursework

Brief the case of Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006) - Coursework Example However Holmes denied the charges and confessed that the crime was committed by a third party named Jimmy Mc Caw White. Holmes was of the opinion that the police framed him in this crime. Defendant also produces several witnesses who claimed that the third party was found in the premises of the crime scene during the hours of crime. Holmes produced several witnesses to prove that he was innocent in this case and was trapped by the police. He also asserted that the forensic results were manipulated by poor handling by the police officer. Issue: Is Holmes guilty for the death of the old women in South Carolina? Any case in order to be justified needs solid evidence against the person who is guilty. Moreover there is argument from the defendant that police his trying to frame him .Holmes suggested that The crime was committed by a third party and also produced witnesses for the same. The only proof against Holmes was the palm print, fiber of clothing and DNA elements found at the vicini ty and on victim respectively. .It was a known fact that the police officer handling the case dealt with evidence collection in a negligent manner. He collected the samples with bare hand and henceforth the results were not trust worthy. The issue before the court is that, on what basis they can prove the guiltiness of the defendant as to the crime. How can the court claim that Holmes committed the crime on the women? Court draws conclusion based on evidence found at the crime scene .With regard to this case all the forensic evidence provided was unreliable due to the poor handling of samples by the police officer. Rule: According to federal rule of evidence, rule 702 is a key one. Cornell University of law(2010) states that â€Å"If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify theret o in the form of an opinion or otherwise, if (1) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data, (2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods, and (3) the witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case†. Analysis: The Federal rule of evidence is crucial here as the whole case is centered around the validity of the forensic evidence found on the vicinity and victim. Once a crime is committed there should be strong evidence against the defendant in order to sentence the defendant. Even though, the evidence is found, the authenticity of it cannot be established due to the manipulation of them by the police officer. . The forensic result of the crime scene was not authentic as the police officer collected the samples without using gloves. This is against the law as samples are not obtained following the principles laid down by the civil procedure. Since the reliability of the evidence is very questionable, the court ca nnot pass any order against Holmes which prove him guilty Conclusion: Since the U.S. Supreme Court was not satisfactory about the credibility of the forensic results, there are no grounds to accuse the defendant of the crime. At the same time the probability of the involvement of the third party was ruled out on the basis of evidence found on the crime scene. Finally it can be concluded that Holmes involvement in the rape and murder could not be established due to lack of genuine evidence. Work cited Law School, Cornell University. (2010, December).